<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WTFbrb</title>
	<link>http://www.wtfbrb.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 07:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Business Passive.</title>
		<link>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2010/06/28/the-business-passive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2010/06/28/the-business-passive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zubin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtfbrb.com/2010/06/28/the-business-passive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In business, ways of saying things catch on fast. One construction that used to bug me, but now just entertains me is &#8220;It would be great if&#8230;&#8221;.  It used to grate on me. Now I joke with a couple coworkers about it, restating the meaningless to sound stronger: &#8220;Greatness would ensue if you could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In business, ways of saying things catch on fast. One construction that used to bug me, but now just entertains me is &#8220;It would be great if&#8230;&#8221;.  It used to grate on me. Now I joke with a couple coworkers about it, restating the meaningless to sound stronger: &#8220;<em>Greatness would ensue</em> if you could write up that report.&#8221; This is a form of the <strong>business passive</strong>, a grammatical construction that is part voice, part mood.</p>
<p>The telltale sign is trying to obscure the fact that you&#8217;re asking for something by declaring that a general greatness (or awesomeness, or even superfantasticness) would arrive if someone could simply perform a task you&#8217;d like done.  It&#8217;s also key to not be too direct about it.  Even &#8220;It would be great if you wrote the document&#8221; may too direct; to be safe, go with &#8220;It would be great if you <em>could write</em> the document&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, sometimes someone gets really desperate for a task to be completed. They enter the stronger (weaker?) form of business passive.  &#8220;It would be great if that report were written by end-of-quarter.&#8221;  This works best when there are only two people involved in this conversation. It also leads to a wonderful reinterpretation. &#8220;Yes, I agree, greatness would truly have been achieved if that report were to show up right before the end of the quarter, fully written!&#8221;</p>
<p>The leap I take at this point (and it is a leap) is that this may not simply be a problem of brevity, clarity, and sensibility. I think it&#8217;s a problem of confidence. People tend towards this voice when asking to do things that really aren&#8217;t important. They themselves don&#8217;t even truly want to see a task done, so they feel uncomfortable asking for it, so they rationalize, assuming that someone somewhere wants this enough that &#8220;it would be great&#8221; to do.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t be sure of that, but there is one thing that I can be sure of. If you&#8217;re not actually willing to &#8220;own&#8221; the fact that you&#8217;re asking someone to act, you shouldn&#8217;t be asking them to. Do it yourself, or define the task to a point where you know its valuable enough for you to delegate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2010/06/28/the-business-passive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To cool your body</title>
		<link>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/07/10/to-cool-your-body/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/07/10/to-cool-your-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zubin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lives and Lifestyles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/07/10/to-cool-your-body/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Put cold water all over your arms and swing them back and forth.  Let gravity do most of the work.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put cold water all over your arms and swing them back and forth.  Let gravity do most of the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/07/10/to-cool-your-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lifehack: Use Gmail search to look up dollar amounts on your statements.</title>
		<link>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/04/13/lifehack-use-gmail-search-to-look-up-dollar-amounts-on-your-statements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/04/13/lifehack-use-gmail-search-to-look-up-dollar-amounts-on-your-statements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zubin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/04/13/lifehack-use-gmail-search-to-look-up-dollar-amounts-on-your-statements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever you use to track your expenditures, categorizing purchases can be a pain, especially if you buy many types of thing from a single retailer, like Amazon.
The easiest way I&#8217;ve found to remember what a particular purchase was is to look at my credit card statement (or mint.com, etc), and search for the prices in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you use to track your expenditures, categorizing purchases can be a pain, especially if you buy many types of thing from a single retailer, like Amazon.</p>
<p>The easiest way I&#8217;ve found to remember what a particular purchase was is to look at my credit card statement (or mint.com, etc), and search for the prices in my Gmail account.  Simple, but it can really save time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2009/04/13/lifehack-use-gmail-search-to-look-up-dollar-amounts-on-your-statements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Iced Coffee Recipe</title>
		<link>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/19/my-iced-coffee-recipe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/19/my-iced-coffee-recipe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zubin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comestibles and potables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/19/my-iced-coffee-recipe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Adapted from my previous post:   My Coffee Recipe)
To start you&#8217;ll need an Aeropress, and a grinder equivalent to Capresso&#8217;s Infinity conical burr grinder.  A normal burr grinder or even a decent blade grinder would probably do just fine, but you might end up with a smokier taste.
You&#8217;ll also need a way to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Adapted from my previous post:  <a href="http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/01/19/my-coffee-recipe/"> My Coffee Recipe</a>)</p>
<p>To start you&#8217;ll need an <a href="http://www.aerobie.com/Products/aeropress.htm">Aeropress</a>, and a grinder equivalent to Capresso&#8217;s <a href="http://www.capresso.com/coffee-grinders-burr-infinity.shtml">Infinity</a> conical burr grinder.  A normal burr grinder or even a decent blade grinder would probably do just fine, but you might end up with a smokier taste.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll also need a way to boil water, a twelve ounce dishwasher safe glass, and of course, some coffee beans (probably at least 1/8 lb to be on the safe side). I don&#8217;t recommend trying a glass that is not dishwasher safe, because even with ice, it will get hot.</p>
<ol>
<li>Fill the glass with ice cubes to half an inch below he rim.</li>
<li>Add skim or 1% milk  to the ice-filled glass until it is up a third of the way</li>
<li>Set up the Aeropress on your glass</li>
<li>Now, bring the water to boil. You&#8217;ll only need about 6oz at the most </li>
<li>Once it begins boiling, turn off the heat.  If you leave it boiling, the water will be to hot when you brew.</li>
<li>Grind on the finest &#8220;fine&#8221; setting on the infinity (not extra fine) for 25-30 seconds (#5 on the infinity), and pour grounds into the Aeropress.</li>
<li>Now, fill the Aeropress the measuring cup/plunger to between 2 and 3 cups.</li>
<li>Trickle some water into the grounds, and then follow with a full pour</li>
<li>Work Aeropress&#8217;s magic. (you know, stir for 10 seconds and then plunge for ~20)</li>
<li>If there is space left over in the glass, just add cool water</li>
<li>Wash Aeropress</li>
<li>Enjoy!</li>
</ol>
<p>I suggest not adding any sugar, so you can get the taste of the bean.  Trust me, give it a couple tries if you&#8217;re used to sugar.  In fact, I don&#8217;t think this method would work well with sugar, since it&#8217;s best to add sugar before icing the coffee, and this ices it right away.  You could try agave syrup instead.<br />
But, if you use this method your coffee will not be very bitter&mdash;only the natural bitterness of the bean which is much less than you&#8217;d expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/19/my-iced-coffee-recipe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signatures on comments.</title>
		<link>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/16/signatures-on-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/16/signatures-on-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zubin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/16/signatures-on-comments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is up with signatures on comments?  Are there people out there who like reading them?  This is definitely a noise/ego problem on many websites.  You can learn to ignore them to some degree, but you inevitably end up glancing at them.  They&#8217;re distracting, they&#8217;re devoid of content, they&#8217;re often only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is up with signatures on comments?  Are there people out there who like reading them?  This is definitely a noise/ego problem on many websites.  You can learn to ignore them to some degree, but you inevitably end up glancing at them.  They&#8217;re distracting, they&#8217;re devoid of content, they&#8217;re often only funny or meaningful to the commenter. </p>
<p>Anyways, if you&#8217;re a blogger, forum administrator, web developer, don&#8217;t allow signatures in comments, you know that&#8217;s the right thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wtfbrb.com/2008/10/16/signatures-on-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

